"you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig"
Adenda 1 (12/Set/15:18) :
Entrevista à ABC
Can you tell the difference?
Miss South Carolina, Miss Teen USA 2007//Miss Alaska 1984:
Adenda 2 (12/Set/15:26)
Entrevista à ABC- excerto da análise do Pedro Dória
♦ Os analistas ouvidos pelo Politco.com se dividem na avaliação da entrevista. Quando perguntada se ela acredita na Doutrina Bush – os EUA têm o direito de atacar quem quiser no mundo mesmo sem provocação – ela responde confusa. ‘Em que sentido? A visão de mundo dele?’ Gibson tem que explicar do que se trata. Gibson pergunta, então, o que ela entende sobre segurança nacional. Ela dá uma resposta a respeito de independência energética. Gibson rebate: ‘mas segurança nacional é bem mais do que isso.’ Ela insiste em sua resposta. Noutro trecho, o repórter tenta pressioná-la para falar sobre as causas do Aquecimento Global. McCain defende que o homem é o agente provocador. No passado, Palin renegou a possibilidade. Ela volta atrás em sua resposta – ‘em parte é responsabilidade do homem’. Gibson a desafia: ‘não foi o que você disse no passado’. Ela diz que jamais foi preemptória.
Ler tudo lá...
_____________________________________________________________
Entrevista à ABC
Can you tell the difference?
Miss South Carolina, Miss Teen USA 2007//Miss Alaska 1984:
Adenda 2 (12/Set/15:26)
Entrevista à ABC- excerto da análise do Pedro Dória
♦ Os analistas ouvidos pelo Politco.com se dividem na avaliação da entrevista. Quando perguntada se ela acredita na Doutrina Bush – os EUA têm o direito de atacar quem quiser no mundo mesmo sem provocação – ela responde confusa. ‘Em que sentido? A visão de mundo dele?’ Gibson tem que explicar do que se trata. Gibson pergunta, então, o que ela entende sobre segurança nacional. Ela dá uma resposta a respeito de independência energética. Gibson rebate: ‘mas segurança nacional é bem mais do que isso.’ Ela insiste em sua resposta. Noutro trecho, o repórter tenta pressioná-la para falar sobre as causas do Aquecimento Global. McCain defende que o homem é o agente provocador. No passado, Palin renegou a possibilidade. Ela volta atrás em sua resposta – ‘em parte é responsabilidade do homem’. Gibson a desafia: ‘não foi o que você disse no passado’. Ela diz que jamais foi preemptória.
Ler tudo lá...
_____________________________________________________________
Matt Damon , mete o ferro na piada de mau gosto que é a candidatura de Sarah Palin: " like a really bad Disney movie", "The Hockey Mom.' Oh, I'm just a hockey mom from Alaska, and she's president...She's facing down Vladimir Putin and using the folksy stuff she learned at the hockey rink. It’s totally absurd… it’s a really terrifying possibility.”
.
Entretanto....tem em versão Executiva, Colegial e Heroína. Nas melhores lojas da especialidade.
The executive doll is available for $27.95 from the website HeroBuilders.com. The action hero version costs two dollars more. (???)
Comentários
Agora foi Pamela Anderson que diz:
...Pamela Anderson has spoken out against Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin saying:"I can't stand her. She can suck it!"
Não podia estar mais de acordo.
"Hockey Mom" . . . What a bunch of crap.
hi dear friend! well, it must be. really!
i found this anda i think is true....
Sarah Palin's most revealing response to Charles Gibson was her unqualified statement that she never had the slightest doubt about her readiness to be President. The woman doesn't even know enough to know she doesn't know enough.
That astonishing declaration of ignorance, hubris and conceit ought to leave every American demanding that John McCain explain what on earth he was thinking in exposing the nation to someone who needs a week of intense briefings just to answer predictable questions from Charles Gibson and who seems to think being President is little more than memorizing right wing talking points and no more challenging than being President of the local PTA.
The fact that the media has to perform this vetting process is both insulting to voters and absurd; it is making us an international laughing stock. It's time for the media to say that being qualified to be President is not the same as being able to pass a quiz at the end of remedial course in foreign events. It's time to demand that John McCain answer for his utter lack of judgment.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/11/sarah-palins-embarrassing-interview-and-what-it-says-about-mccain/
big big hug from me in Portugal.
lá que ela chamou a atenção para o baton...
as criticas à entrevista são fantasticas...loool
como essa aí em cima
Herald Tribune
Gibson, who sat back in his chair and wriggled his foot impatiently, had the skeptical, annoyed tone of a university president who agrees to interview the daughter of a trustee, but doesn't believe she merits admission.
When he asked her, slowly and solemnly to "look the country in the eye" and say whether she truly felt qualified to be vice president and possibly commander in chief, Gibson seemed to expect Palin to express at least a moment of humility and self-doubt
Alessandra Stanley
This may (or may not) be true. However, MOST PEOPLE AREN'T RUNNING FOR VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. She is.
ora nem mais!!
pois...é a verdadeira "sem-noção". ou a verdadeira inconsciência dos limites..lá na ideia dela, tem todas as condições para deter o "nuclear code" como diz o Matt Damon..
Mas depois caio na realidade quando tenho o tal inevitável pensamento de causa efeito, que é no fundo pensar que os americanos dificilmente escolhem bem e melhor exemplo foi a segunda eleição de Bush!
Este Gibson pelos vistos dever ter milhares de amigos lá nos States!
"At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' "
-- New York Times, Sept. 12
Informed her? Rubbish.
The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.
There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.
He asked Palin, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"
She responded, quite sensibly to a question that is ambiguous, "In what respect, Charlie?"
Sensing his "gotcha" moment, Gibson refused to tell her. After making her fish for the answer, Gibson grudgingly explained to the moose-hunting rube that the Bush doctrine "is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense."
Wrong!
I know something about the subject because, as the Wikipedia entry on the Bush doctrine notes, I was the first to use the term. In the cover essay of the June 4, 2001, issue of the Weekly Standard entitled, "The Bush Doctrine: ABM, Kyoto, and the New American Unilateralism," I suggested that the Bush administration policies of unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty and rejecting the Kyoto protocol, together with others, amounted to a radical change in foreign policy that should be called the Bush doctrine